Who Wins? AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS Takes on Intel Core i9 11980HK in a CPU Face-off!

Main points

The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is built on AMD’s Zen 4 architecture, while the Core i9 11980HK is based on Intel’s Tiger Lake architecture.
While neither CPU is designed for top-tier gaming, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s integrated graphics deliver a slightly better gaming experience compared to the Core i9 11980HK’s Intel Iris Xe Graphics.
The Core i9 11980HK’s additional cores could be beneficial in more demanding scenarios, but the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s overall efficiency and faster clock speeds make it a compelling choice.

Choosing the right CPU for your laptop is a crucial decision, impacting performance, battery life, and overall user experience. In this head-to-head showdown, we’ll dissect the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and Intel Core i9 11980HK, two popular processors often found in high-end laptops. We’ll explore their core features, benchmark performance, and real-world applications to help you determine which CPU best suits your needs.

Outline

Core Features: A Glimpse into the Architecture
Benchmark Performance: A Tale of Two Champions
Power Consumption and Battery Life: A Balancing Act
Integrated Graphics: A Visual Showdown
Real-World Applications: Putting the CPUs to the Test

Core Features: A Glimpse into the Architecture

The AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and Intel Core i9 11980HK represent different generations of processor technology. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is built on AMD’s Zen 4 architecture, while the Core i9 11980HK is based on Intel’s Tiger Lake architecture.
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS:

Architecture: Zen 4
Cores: 6
Threads: 12
Base Clock: 3.0 GHz
Boost Clock: 4.8 GHz
Cache: 16 MB L3
TDP: 35W (configurable)
Integrated Graphics: AMD Radeon 760M

Intel Core i9 11980HK:

Architecture: Tiger Lake
Cores: 8
Threads: 16
Base Clock: 2.3 GHz
Boost Clock: 4.6 GHz
Cache: 24 MB L3
TDP: 45W (configurable)
Integrated Graphics: Intel Iris Xe Graphics

Benchmark Performance: A Tale of Two Champions

While the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS boasts a lower core count than the Core i9 11980HK, its Zen 4 architecture delivers significant performance gains. In numerous benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS outperforms the Core i9 11980HK in single-core and multi-core tasks. This indicates superior performance in everyday tasks like web browsing, productivity software, and light gaming.
Single-Core Performance:
The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS consistently outperforms the Core i9 11980HK in single-core benchmarks. This is primarily due to the higher clock speeds and improved efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. This translates to faster application loading times, smoother multitasking, and better responsiveness in demanding scenarios.
Multi-Core Performance:
Although the Core i9 11980HK has two more cores, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS still manages to outperform it in multi-core benchmarks. This is attributed to the Zen 4 architecture’s efficiency and the higher clock speeds. This advantage is noticeable in tasks that utilize multiple cores, such as video editing, 3D rendering, and complex simulations.

Power Consumption and Battery Life: A Balancing Act

The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS is designed with a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 35W compared to the Core i9 11980HK’s 45W. This translates to lower power consumption and potentially longer battery life. However, the actual battery life depends on factors such as screen size, usage patterns, and other components in the laptop.

Integrated Graphics: A Visual Showdown

Both processors offer integrated graphics solutions. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS features the AMD Radeon 760M, while the Core i9 11980HK utilizes Intel Iris Xe Graphics. The AMD Radeon 760M generally offers better performance compared to the Intel Iris Xe Graphics, particularly in gaming. However, neither option is ideal for demanding gaming experiences. For serious gaming, a dedicated graphics card is recommended.

Real-World Applications: Putting the CPUs to the Test

In real-world applications, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS proves to be a versatile performer. Its strong single-core performance excels in everyday tasks, while its multi-core capabilities handle resource-intensive workloads with ease. The Core i9 11980HK, despite having more cores, falls behind in single-core performance and may struggle with tasks that demand high clock speeds.
Productivity:
Both CPUs can handle demanding productivity applications like Adobe Photoshop, Premiere Pro, and Final Cut Pro with ease. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s faster clock speeds provide a slight edge in responsiveness and application loading times.
Gaming:
While neither CPU is designed for top-tier gaming, the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s integrated graphics deliver a slightly better gaming experience compared to the Core i9 11980HK’s Intel Iris Xe Graphics. However, for serious gaming, a dedicated graphics card is essential.
Content Creation:
The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s strong multi-core performance makes it a capable processor for content creation tasks like video editing, 3D modeling, and music production. The Core i9 11980HK’s additional cores could be beneficial in more demanding scenarios, but the Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS’s overall efficiency and faster clock speeds make it a compelling choice.

The Verdict: Choosing the Right Champion

The choice between the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and Intel Core i9 11980HK ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities.
Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS if you:

Prioritize overall performance, particularly in single-core tasks.
Value longer battery life.
Need a processor that can handle demanding workloads while remaining efficient.

Choose the Intel Core i9 11980HK if you:

Require a processor with a higher core count for extremely demanding multi-threaded applications.
Need a CPU with a slightly higher boost clock speed.
Are willing to sacrifice some efficiency and battery life for maximum raw processing power.

The Final Round: A Farewell to the Champions

Ultimately, both the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS and Intel Core i9 11980HK are powerful processors that can deliver exceptional performance. The Ryzen 5 Pro 7640HS stands out with its exceptional single-core performance, efficiency, and longer battery life, making it an excellent choice for a wide range of users. The Core i9 11980HK, with its higher core count, offers more processing power for highly demanding applications, but it comes at the cost of efficiency and battery life.