Compare CPUs Head-to-Head. Make the Right Choice.

Unveiling the Future: Intel Core i7 4720HQ vs Intel Core i9 10900K – Which Processor Should You Choose?

Key points

  • In this blog post, we’ll delve into a head-to-head comparison of two popular processors, the Intel Core i7 4720HQ and the Intel Core i9 10900K, to help you make an informed decision.
  • The Intel Core i9 10900K significantly outperforms the Intel Core i7 4720HQ in every performance metric due to its newer architecture, higher core count, and faster clock speeds.
  • Choosing between the Intel Core i7 4720HQ and the Intel Core i9 10900K ultimately boils down to your individual needs and budget.

Choosing the right CPU for your needs can be a daunting task, especially with the vast array of options available. In this blog post, we’ll delve into a head-to-head comparison of two popular processors, the Intel Core i7 4720HQ and the Intel Core i9 10900K, to help you make an informed decision. These processors represent two distinct generations of Intel’s CPU lineup and cater to different use cases.

Understanding the Intel Core i7 4720HQ

The Intel Core i7 4720HQ is a quad-core processor belonging to Intel’s Haswell architecture, released in 2013. It’s a mobile processor designed for laptops and other portable devices. The 4720HQ boasts a base clock speed of 2.6 GHz and can boost up to 3.6 GHz with Intel’s Turbo Boost technology. It features 6 MB of L3 cache and supports Hyper-Threading, enabling it to handle up to eight threads concurrently.

Exploring the Intel Core i9 10900K

The Intel Core i9 10900K, on the other hand, is a desktop processor from Intel’s Comet Lake architecture, launched in 2020. It’s a powerful 10-core processor with a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a boost clock of 5.3 GHz. The 10900K comes equipped with 20 MB of L3 cache and supports Hyper-Threading, allowing it to manage up to 20 threads simultaneously.

Performance Comparison: A Detailed Breakdown

The Intel Core i9 10900K significantly outperforms the Intel Core i7 4720HQ in every performance metric due to its newer architecture, higher core count, and faster clock speeds. Here’s a closer look at the key performance aspects:
1. Single-Core Performance: The 10900K’s single-core performance is significantly better than the 4720HQ due to its higher clock speed and newer architecture. This translates to faster responsiveness in applications that rely heavily on single-threaded performance, such as web browsing, video editing, and gaming.
2. Multi-Core Performance: The 10900K’s 10 cores and 20 threads significantly outclass the 4720HQ’s four cores and eight threads. This advantage is crucial for demanding tasks like video rendering, 3D modeling, and heavy multitasking. The 10900K can handle these tasks with ease, while the 4720HQ may struggle to keep up.
3. Gaming Performance: While the 10900K excels in multi-core performance, its gaming performance is not significantly better than the 4720HQ, especially in modern titles. This is because game performance often depends on single-core performance and GPU capabilities. However, the 10900K can handle demanding games at higher resolutions and frame rates, offering a smoother gaming experience.
4. Power Consumption: The 10900K consumes significantly more power than the 4720HQ due to its higher core count and clock speeds. This can lead to higher heat generation and increased energy bills.

Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs

The best processor for your needs depends on your specific usage patterns and budget. Here’s a breakdown of when each processor might be the better choice:
Intel Core i7 4720HQ:

  • Ideal for: Laptops and portable devices, casual gaming, basic productivity tasks, and multimedia consumption.
  • Pros: Lower power consumption, more affordable, and sufficient performance for everyday tasks.
  • Cons: Limited multi-core performance, outdated architecture, and potential for thermal throttling under heavy load.

Intel Core i9 10900K:

  • Ideal for: High-performance gaming, video editing, 3D modeling, software development, and demanding multitasking scenarios.
  • Pros: Exceptional multi-core performance, high clock speeds, and robust gaming capabilities.
  • Cons: High power consumption, higher price point, and potential for overheating without proper cooling solutions.

Key Points: Making the Right Decision

Choosing between the Intel Core i7 4720HQ and the Intel Core i9 10900K ultimately boils down to your individual needs and budget. If you prioritize portability, affordability, and decent performance for everyday tasks, the 4720HQ might be a suitable choice. However, if you require top-tier performance for demanding applications, the 10900K is the clear winner.

What You Need to Learn

1. Is the Intel Core i9 10900K worth the extra cost compared to the Intel Core i7 4720HQ?
The answer depends on your needs. If you require the highest possible performance for demanding tasks, the 10900K’s price premium is justified. However, if your needs are more modest, the 4720HQ offers a good balance of performance and affordability.
2. Can I upgrade the Intel Core i7 4720HQ to an Intel Core i9 10900K?
No, you cannot directly upgrade the 4720HQ to the 10900K. These processors have different sockets and are incompatible with each other. You would need to purchase a new motherboard and CPU to make such an upgrade.
3. Which processor is better for gaming?
Both processors can handle modern games, but the 10900K offers a slight edge due to its higher clock speeds and multi-core performance. However, the difference in gaming performance may not be significant for most users.
4. What are the recommended cooling solutions for the Intel Core i9 10900K?
The 10900K generates significant heat, so a high-quality CPU cooler is essential. A large air cooler or a liquid cooler with a 240mm radiator is recommended to keep the processor cool and prevent thermal throttling.
5. What are the future-proofing capabilities of these processors?
The 4720HQ is an older processor and may struggle to keep up with future software and game requirements. The 10900K is a more recent processor and has better future-proofing capabilities, but it’s still susceptible to obsolescence as technology advances.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Ethan is a passionate tech enthusiast and writer at Processor Insight, where he dives into the intricacies of CPUs, providing comprehensive comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and practical tips to help readers make informed decisions.