Main points
- While it’s a solid performer for its time, the 3475S is considered an older CPU, lacking the modern features and performance of newer processors.
- The 10900X is designed for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, showcasing a significant leap in performance compared to the 3475S.
- For instance, in Cinebench R23, a popular CPU benchmark, the 10900X achieves a multi-core score of around 22,000, while the 3475S scores roughly 5,000.
Are you looking to upgrade your computer’s processing power? Perhaps you’re building a new PC or considering replacing your aging CPU. If so, you might be wondering about the differences between the Intel Core i5 3475S and the Intel Core i9 10900X. These processors represent two distinct generations of Intel technology, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. This blog post will delve into a comprehensive comparison of these CPUs, exploring their key features, performance benchmarks, and ultimately helping you decide which one is right for your needs.
The Core i5 3475S: A Legacy of Third-Generation Intel
The Intel Core i5 3475S is a member of Intel’s third-generation Core processor family, codenamed Ivy Bridge. Released in 2012, it’s a quad-core CPU with a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz and a Turbo Boost frequency of 3.6 GHz. It packs 6 MB of L3 cache and operates with a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 77 watts. While it’s a solid performer for its time, the 3475S is considered an older CPU, lacking the modern features and performance of newer processors.
The Core i9 10900X: A Beast of the 10th Generation
The Intel Core i9 10900X is a powerhouse CPU from Intel’s 10th generation Core series, codenamed Comet Lake. Released in 2019, it boasts 10 cores and 20 threads, running at a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and a Turbo Boost frequency of 4.7 GHz. This CPU features a massive 20 MB of L3 cache and has a TDP of 165 watts. The 10900X is designed for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and professional workloads, showcasing a significant leap in performance compared to the 3475S.
Performance Comparison: A Clear Winner Emerges
The performance gap between these two CPUs is substantial. The 10900X outperforms the 3475S in every category, offering significantly faster speeds and greater processing power. In benchmark tests, the 10900X consistently scores higher in multi-core performance, single-core performance, and overall system responsiveness.
For instance, in Cinebench R23, a popular CPU benchmark, the 10900X achieves a multi-core score of around 22,000, while the 3475S scores roughly 5,000. This stark difference highlights the 10900X’s superior multi-threading capabilities, making it ideal for tasks that benefit from parallel processing.
Features and Technology: A Modern Advantage
The 10900X benefits from Intel’s advancements in CPU technology since the release of the 3475S. It supports newer technologies like PCIe 4.0, which offers faster data transfer speeds for peripherals and storage devices. The 10900X also supports Intel‘s Optane memory technology, enabling faster boot times and application loading.
The 3475S, on the other hand, is limited to PCIe 3.0 and lacks support for Optane memory. Additionally, the 10900X comes with Intel’s Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0, which dynamically identifies the CPU’s fastest cores and prioritizes them for demanding workloads. This feature further enhances the 10900X’s performance.
Power Consumption and Thermal Management: A Trade-Off
While the 10900X offers superior performance, it comes at a cost. Its high core count and clock speeds result in a significantly higher TDP compared to the 3475S. This means the 10900X consumes more power and generates more heat, requiring a more robust cooling solution.
The 3475S, with its lower TDP, is more power-efficient and generates less heat. However, its performance limitations may not be sufficient for demanding modern applications.
Cost Comparison: Reflecting Performance and Features
The price difference between these two CPUs reflects their performance and feature set. The 10900X is significantly more expensive than the 3475S, reflecting its advanced technology and superior processing power. However, the 3475S is a budget-friendly option for users who don’t require the extreme performance of the 10900X.
Key Points: Choosing the Right Processor
The choice between the Intel Core i5 3475S and the Intel Core i9 10900X ultimately depends on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a budget-friendly CPU for basic tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and light gaming, the 3475S might suffice. However, if you require high performance for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, or high-end gaming, the 10900X is the clear winner.
Consider your budget, the types of applications you use, and the level of performance you require before making your decision.
Basics You Wanted To Know
Q: Is the Intel Core i9 10900X still a good CPU in 2023?
A: While the 10900X is a powerful CPU, it’s now considered an older generation. Newer CPUs like the 12th and 13th generation Intel processors offer improved performance and efficiency. However, the 10900X can still provide a solid performance for many tasks, especially if you can find it at a good price.
Q: Can I upgrade the Intel Core i5 3475S to the Intel Core i9 10900X?
A: Unfortunately, you can’t directly upgrade the CPU on most motherboards. The 3475S uses a different socket (LGA1155) than the 10900X (LGA2066). You would need to purchase a new motherboard compatible with the 10900X, along with other components like RAM and a compatible cooling solution.
Q: What are some alternatives to the Intel Core i9 10900X?
A: If you’re looking for a high-performance CPU, consider newer options like the Intel Core i9-12900K, Intel Core i9-13900K, or AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. These CPUs offer improved performance, efficiency, and feature sets compared to the 10900X.
Q: Is the Intel Core i5 3475S still supported by Windows 11?
A: While the 3475S might technically work with Windows 11, it’s not officially supported. You might encounter compatibility issues and performance limitations. It’s recommended to use a supported CPU for a smooth and optimal Windows 11 experience.
