Compare CPUs Head-to-Head. Make the Right Choice.

Unleashing Power: Intel Core i9 12900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 164U Performance Battle!

Key points

  • It boasts a powerful combination of performance cores (P-cores) and efficient cores (E-cores) for a blend of raw power and energy efficiency.
  • The i9 12900’s higher core count and faster clock speeds give it an edge in demanding titles, but the Ultra 7 164U holds its own in most games and offers impressive performance for a mobile processor.
  • The Intel Iris Xe Graphics integrated into the Ultra 7 164U is a significant leap forward in performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730 in the i9 12900.

Choosing the right CPU for your needs can be a daunting task, especially when faced with a vast array of options. Today, we’re pitting two heavyweights against each other: the Intel Core i9 12900 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U. These processors represent vastly different segments of the market, with the i9 12900 targeting high-end desktop PCs and the Ultra 7 164U powering a new generation of ultra-thin laptops. This blog post will delve into their core features, performance metrics, and ultimately help you decide which processor is the right fit for your specific needs.

Understanding the Competitors

The Intel Core i9 12900, released in late 2021, is a 12th-generation Alder Lake processor. It boasts a powerful combination of performance cores (P-cores) and efficient cores (E-cores) for a blend of raw power and energy efficiency. This processor is designed for demanding tasks like gaming, content creation, and professional workloads.
On the other hand, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is a brand new processor from Intel’s 14th generation, codenamed Meteor Lake. This chip is designed for ultra-thin laptops and aims to provide a perfect balance of performance and power efficiency. It utilizes a new architecture and incorporates advanced features like AI acceleration.

Comparing Core Features

Intel Core i9 12900:

  • Architecture: Alder Lake
  • Cores: 16 (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores)
  • Threads: 24
  • Base Clock Speed: 2.5 GHz
  • Boost Clock Speed: 5.1 GHz
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 730
  • TDP: 125W (PL1)
  • Max Turbo Power: 241W (PL2)

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U:

  • Architecture: Meteor Lake
  • Cores: 10 (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores)
  • Threads: 16
  • Base Clock Speed: 1.3 GHz
  • Boost Clock Speed: 4.6 GHz
  • Integrated Graphics: Intel Iris Xe Graphics
  • TDP: 15W (PL1)
  • Max Turbo Power: 55W (PL2)

Performance Breakdown: A Head-to-Head Comparison

CPU Performance:
The Intel Core i9 12900 is a clear winner in terms of raw CPU performance. Its higher core count, faster clock speeds, and larger cache size allow it to excel in demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and multi-tasking. The Ultra 7 164U, while still capable, falls behind due to its lower core count and clock speeds.
Gaming Performance:
Both processors deliver smooth gaming experiences at high resolutions. The i9 12900’s higher core count and faster clock speeds give it an edge in demanding titles, but the Ultra 7 164U holds its own in most games and offers impressive performance for a mobile processor.
Power Consumption:
The Ultra 7 164U is designed with power efficiency in mind. Its low TDP and efficient architecture allow it to deliver impressive performance while consuming significantly less power than the i9 12900. This translates to longer battery life in laptops.
Integrated Graphics:
The Intel Iris Xe Graphics integrated into the Ultra 7 164U is a significant leap forward in performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 730 in the i9 12900. This means the Ultra 7 164U can handle more demanding graphics tasks and provide smoother performance in less demanding games.

Choosing the Right Processor: A Practical Guide

Intel Core i9 12900:

  • Ideal for:
  • Gamers seeking the highest frame rates
  • Content creators working with demanding software
  • Professionals requiring high-performance computing power
  • Users who prioritize raw performance and are willing to sacrifice portability and power efficiency

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U:

  • Ideal for:
  • Ultra-thin laptop users prioritizing portability and battery life
  • Casual gamers and users who need a balance of performance and power efficiency
  • Students and professionals who need a powerful yet portable device for daily tasks

The Future of Intel’s Processor Lineup: A Glimpse into Meteor Lake

The launch of the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U marks a significant shift in Intel’s processor strategy. With Meteor Lake, Intel is focusing on delivering performance and efficiency gains while also introducing new features like AI acceleration. This new generation of processors is poised to power a new wave of innovative devices, from ultra-thin laptops to powerful gaming machines.

The Verdict: A Tale of Two Processors

Both the Intel Core i9 12900 and Intel Core Ultra 7 164U are impressive processors, each excelling in their respective segments. The i9 12900 remains a powerhouse for desktop PCs, offering unmatched performance for demanding tasks. The Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, represents the future of mobile computing, delivering a perfect balance of performance and power efficiency for ultra-thin laptops. Ultimately, the best processor for you depends on your individual needs and priorities.

Popular Questions

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Intel Core i9 12900 offers slightly better gaming performance due to its higher core count and faster clock speeds. However, the Ultra 7 164U delivers impressive performance for a mobile processor and can handle most games smoothly.
Q: Which processor is more power efficient?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is significantly more power efficient thanks to its lower TDP and optimized architecture. This translates to longer battery life in laptops.
Q: Which processor is better for multi-tasking?
A: The Intel Core i9 12900 excels in multi-tasking due to its higher core count and thread count. The Ultra 7 164U can handle multi-tasking well, but the i9 12900 will provide a smoother experience in demanding scenarios.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing?
A: For video editing, the Intel Core i9 12900 is the clear winner. Its higher core count and faster clock speeds allow it to handle complex editing tasks with ease.
Q: Which processor is more future-proof?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U, based on the new Meteor Lake architecture, is likely to be more future-proof. It incorporates new features and technologies that will be essential for future computing needs.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Ethan is a passionate tech enthusiast and writer at Processor Insight, where he dives into the intricacies of CPUs, providing comprehensive comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and practical tips to help readers make informed decisions.