Compare CPUs Head-to-Head. Make the Right Choice.

Revolutionize Your Computing: Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core i9 7960X – The Ultimate Comparison

Quick Overview

  • Choosing the right CPU can be a daunting task, especially when faced with options as diverse as the Intel Celeron N5095 and the Intel Core i9 7960X.
  • Similar to Cinebench, the 7960X achieves a substantial lead in both single-core and multi-core scores, highlighting its superior processing power.
  • The Intel Core i9 7960X, on the other hand, is a premium processor with a price tag that reflects its exceptional performance.

Choosing the right CPU can be a daunting task, especially when faced with options as diverse as the Intel Celeron N5095 and the Intel Core i9 7960X. These two processors represent vastly different ends of the performance spectrum, catering to distinct needs and budgets. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their key features, performance metrics, and suitability for various applications, helping you make an informed decision.

The Contenders: A Brief Overview

Intel Celeron N5095: This is a low-power, budget-friendly processor designed for entry-level laptops, mini PCs, and other compact devices. It’s a dual-core processor with a base clock speed of 2.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 2.9 GHz. The N5095 incorporates Intel’s integrated UHD Graphics 605, making it suitable for light workloads and casual gaming.
Intel Core i9 7960X: This is a high-end, desktop-grade processor aimed at power users and enthusiasts. It’s a 10-core, 20-thread processor with a base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.5 GHz. The 7960X features a massive L3 cache of 13.75 MB and supports high-speed memory, making it a powerhouse for demanding tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and gaming.

Performance Showdown: Benchmarks and Real-World Usage

CPU Benchmarks:

  • Cinebench R23: The 7960X demonstrates its dominance with significantly higher scores in both single-core and multi-core benchmarks. The N5095 struggles to keep up, especially in multi-threaded workloads.
  • Geekbench 5: Similar to Cinebench, the 7960X achieves a substantial lead in both single-core and multi-core scores, highlighting its superior processing power.
  • PassMark: The 7960X scores significantly higher in the overall performance benchmark, indicating its overall performance advantage.

Real-World Usage:

  • Gaming: The 7960X excels in demanding games, delivering smooth frame rates at high resolutions. The N5095 is suitable for casual gaming at lower resolutions and settings.
  • Video Editing: The 7960X handles complex video editing projects with ease, thanks to its powerful multi-core performance. The N5095 struggles with heavy editing tasks, leading to longer rendering times.
  • 3D Rendering: The 7960X significantly accelerates 3D rendering processes, making it ideal for professionals and enthusiasts. The N5095 is not suitable for demanding 3D rendering workloads.
  • Productivity: The 7960X handles demanding productivity tasks, such as multitasking, coding, and data analysis, with remarkable efficiency. The N5095 is suitable for basic productivity tasks but may struggle with resource-intensive applications.

Key Features: A Detailed Comparison

Cores and Threads: The 7960X boasts 10 cores and 20 threads, offering exceptional multi-tasking capabilities. The N5095 features only 2 cores and 4 threads, limiting its performance in multi-threaded applications.
Clock Speed: The 7960X has a higher base clock speed of 3.0 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.5 GHz compared to the N5095’s 2.0 GHz base and 2.9 GHz boost.
Cache: The 7960X has a massive 13.75 MB L3 cache, significantly larger than the N5095’s cache. This allows the 7960X to store more data locally, enabling faster access and improved performance.
Memory Support: The 7960X supports high-speed DDR4 memory, while the N5095 supports DDR4-2400 memory.
TDP: The 7960X has a much higher TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 165W, reflecting its power consumption and heat output. The N5095 has a much lower TDP of 10W, making it suitable for energy-efficient devices.
Integrated Graphics: The 7960X does not have integrated graphics, requiring a dedicated graphics card for visual output. The N5095 features Intel’s UHD Graphics 605, providing basic graphics capabilities for light workloads.

Price and Value: Balancing Performance and Budget

The Intel Celeron N5095 is a highly affordable option, making it ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize affordability over raw performance. The Intel Core i9 7960X, on the other hand, is a premium processor with a price tag that reflects its exceptional performance.

In a nutshell: Choosing the Right Processor for Your Needs

The Intel Celeron N5095 and the Intel Core i9 7960X cater to distinct user segments. The N5095 is a budget-friendly option suitable for basic tasks, casual gaming, and energy-efficient devices. The 7960X is a powerhouse processor designed for demanding workloads, including video editing, 3D rendering, and high-end gaming. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and intended applications.

Basics You Wanted To Know

Q: What is the best CPU for gaming?
A: The Intel Core i9 7960X is a superior choice for gaming due to its powerful performance and ability to handle demanding games at high resolutions.
Q: Which CPU is better for video editing?
A: The Intel Core i9 7960X is the clear winner for video editing, thanks to its multi-core performance that accelerates rendering and other video editing tasks.
Q: Is the Intel Celeron N5095 good for everyday use?
A: The Intel Celeron N5095 is suitable for everyday use involving basic tasks like web browsing, email, and light productivity work. However, it may struggle with demanding applications or multitasking.
Q: What is the difference between the Intel Celeron N5095 and the Intel Core i9 7960X?
A: The Intel Celeron N5095 is a low-power, budget-friendly processor with limited performance, while the Intel Core i9 7960X is a high-end, powerful processor designed for demanding workloads. They differ significantly in terms of cores, threads, clock speed, cache, memory support, TDP, and integrated graphics.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Ethan is a passionate tech enthusiast and writer at Processor Insight, where he dives into the intricacies of CPUs, providing comprehensive comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and practical tips to help readers make informed decisions.