Compare CPUs Head-to-Head. Make the Right Choice.

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS vs Intel Core i9 9900: The Ultimate Showdown for CPU Performance

What to know

  • The Ryzen 5 7640HS comes equipped with integrated Radeon 760M graphics, offering a significant leap in performance compared to the integrated graphics found in older processors.
  • Its price may be lower than the **7640HS**, but it’s important to consider the diminishing value of an older processor and the lack of integrated graphics.
  • The **Core i9 9900** may still hold its ground in multi-threaded applications, but its power consumption and lack of integrated graphics make it less appealing in the current landscape.

The world of CPUs is a constant battleground, with AMD and Intel vying for dominance. Today, we’re pitting two titans against each other: the AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS and the **Intel Core i9 9900**. This matchup throws a modern, energy-efficient processor against a powerhouse from a previous generation, creating a fascinating comparison. Let’s dive into their strengths and weaknesses to see who emerges victorious.

The Contenders: A Quick Overview

AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS: This processor is a part of AMD’s latest Ryzen 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture. It boasts impressive performance and efficiency, targeting thin and light laptops. The 7640HS is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU with a base clock speed of 3.8GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.1GHz. It also features integrated Radeon 760M graphics.
Intel Core i9 9900: This CPU is a high-end desktop processor from Intel’s 9th generation, built on the Coffee Lake architecture. It’s an 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a base clock speed of 3.1GHz and a boost clock speed of 5.0GHz. The 9900 is known for its powerful performance, especially in multi-threaded applications.

Performance: A Head-to-Head Showdown

The Ryzen 5 7640HS leverages the efficiency of its Zen 4 architecture to deliver impressive performance. It outperforms the **Core i9 9900** in single-core benchmarks, showcasing its superior clock speeds and architectural advancements. However, the **Core i9 9900** still holds its ground in multi-core tasks thanks to its additional cores and threads.
While the Ryzen 5 7640HS may not be as dominant in multi-threaded workloads, its efficiency makes it a strong contender for everyday tasks. Its lower power consumption allows for longer battery life in laptops, a crucial factor for mobile users.

Power Consumption and Efficiency: A Tale of Two Generations

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is a shining example of AMD’s commitment to energy efficiency. Its 7nm process technology allows it to deliver powerful performance with significantly less power consumption compared to the **Core i9 9900**. This translates to longer battery life in laptops and cooler operating temperatures, making the **7640HS** an ideal choice for mobile users.
The Core i9 9900, on the other hand, is a power-hungry beast. Its 14nm process technology requires more power to achieve its high performance, leading to shorter battery life and potentially higher temperatures in laptops.

Integrated Graphics: The Rise of the Radeon 760M

The Ryzen 5 7640HS comes equipped with integrated Radeon 760M graphics, offering a significant leap in performance compared to the integrated graphics found in older processors. This makes the **7640HS** capable of handling light gaming and creative tasks, eliminating the need for a dedicated graphics card in many scenarios.
The Core i9 9900, lacking integrated graphics, requires a dedicated graphics card for any visual tasks beyond basic display output. This increases the cost and complexity of building a system around the **9900**, especially for users who prioritize portability and budget.

Price and Availability: A Matter of Value and Options

The Ryzen 5 7640HS is a relatively new processor, making it readily available in the latest laptop models. Its price point is competitive, especially considering its performance and efficiency.
The Core i9 9900, being a previous generation processor, is still available in the market but is generally found in older systems. Its price may be lower than the **7640HS**, but it’s important to consider the diminishing value of an older processor and the lack of integrated graphics.

The Verdict: A Modern Champion Emerges

The AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS emerges as the clear winner in this battle of generations. Its superior efficiency, impressive performance in single-core tasks, and integrated graphics make it an ideal choice for modern users. The **Core i9 9900** may still hold its ground in multi-threaded applications, but its power consumption and lack of integrated graphics make it less appealing in the current landscape.

The Future of Computing: Efficiency and Integration

This comparison highlights the evolution of CPU technology. The Ryzen 5 7640HS embodies the modern trend towards efficiency and integration, offering powerful performance while minimizing power consumption and cost. This trend is likely to continue, with future processors focusing on even higher levels of efficiency and more powerful integrated graphics.

What People Want to Know

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?
A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS has a slight edge in gaming due to its integrated Radeon 760M graphics, which can handle light to medium-demanding games. However, for high-end gaming, a dedicated graphics card is still recommended for both processors.
Q: Which processor is better for video editing and other creative tasks?
A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS offers better overall performance for video editing and creative tasks due to its single-core performance and integrated graphics. However, the **Core i9 9900** might be a better choice for very demanding video editing projects that require high multi-core performance.
Q: Which processor is better for everyday tasks like browsing and productivity?
A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS is the better choice for everyday tasks due to its efficiency and integrated graphics. It offers a smoother experience with longer battery life in laptops.
Q: Which processor is more future-proof?
A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS is more future-proof due to its newer architecture and support for future technologies. The **Core i9 9900** is a previous generation processor and may not be compatible with future software and hardware advancements.
Q: Which processor is better value for money?
A: The Ryzen 5 7640HS offers better value for money due to its performance, efficiency, and integrated graphics. The **Core i9 9900** may be cheaper, but its lack of integrated graphics and diminishing value make it less attractive in the current market.

Was this page helpful?No
About the Author
Ethan is a passionate tech enthusiast and writer at Processor Insight, where he dives into the intricacies of CPUs, providing comprehensive comparison guides, insightful knowledge, and practical tips to help readers make informed decisions.